For this semesters work, I wanted to push the possibilities of the the sculpture/picture dichotomy around a bit. First, I started painting this semester! The goal I had had in mind was to make paintings with which I could explore the way I treat my ceramics but on a flat plane. I had intended for the paintings to end up working alongside my ceramics--not in synthesis, but in some sort of environmentally activating conjunction. But the paintings took a different path than I had intended (see post below). However, as I was painting I would run out any unused paint on these panels of underlayment I had sitting around, and as these panels developed, I realized that they were bound to work well with ceramic elements. As much of my works deals with the allusion to the figuration, I began working on ways to depart from the freestanding figure. The idea here is to activate space through a formal sort of inquiry into the ways which the figure (or allusion thereof) can be approached as an art object. The synthesis here of ceramics and painting becomes important in the way with which I can present the figure in the flat plane as well as the freestanding figure. Some of these works be directly connected with one another, while others will simply exist within the same space--or hopefully anyway.
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
Working toward a synthesis of painting and ceramic sculpture
For this semesters work, I wanted to push the possibilities of the the sculpture/picture dichotomy around a bit. First, I started painting this semester! The goal I had had in mind was to make paintings with which I could explore the way I treat my ceramics but on a flat plane. I had intended for the paintings to end up working alongside my ceramics--not in synthesis, but in some sort of environmentally activating conjunction. But the paintings took a different path than I had intended (see post below). However, as I was painting I would run out any unused paint on these panels of underlayment I had sitting around, and as these panels developed, I realized that they were bound to work well with ceramic elements. As much of my works deals with the allusion to the figuration, I began working on ways to depart from the freestanding figure. The idea here is to activate space through a formal sort of inquiry into the ways which the figure (or allusion thereof) can be approached as an art object. The synthesis here of ceramics and painting becomes important in the way with which I can present the figure in the flat plane as well as the freestanding figure. Some of these works be directly connected with one another, while others will simply exist within the same space--or hopefully anyway.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



Those paintings look like perfect!
ReplyDeleteDo you think you have to synthesize the two? Do you feel an obligation to ceramics because it's what you've always done? What happens if you take a hiatus from ceramics?
ReplyDeleteAmy: awesome set of questions! So, I don't think I have to synthesize the two, nor do I feel an some odd sense of obligation to ceramics simply because its what I have been doing for a while. I work in ceramics for the process it presents, and for the form and surface I can achieve with it. I suspect that I will stop working in ceramics when I am no longer interested in the process and possibilities it presents. So, while I have taken a mild sort of hiatus from ceramics over this semester, this break has only served to enhance my interest and appreciation for the medium. I will post some insights in this post as well as in a post about painting.
ReplyDelete